Nataev
16-Oktyabr 2009da qoʻshildi
Kontent oʻchirildi Kontent qoʻshildi
Tahrir izohi yoʻq |
|||
Qator 14:
::But one thing I don't know regarding ''Bambi'' is whether to use the original name (which is in English, though it was based on a book that was originally Austrian, and thus originally written in German) or the Russian spelling, which spells it as ''Bembi''. The reason I ask this is because on the article about Dumbo, it was titled [[Dambo]] like in Russian. "Dumbo" was also an article that was deleted, but of course it wouldn't be useful to restore it since the current article is better, but could it at least be redirected from the English name to the Uzbek? Also, as long as redirects are a good thing, there are other pages that could redirect to [[Tulki va it]]. Like for example, [[Tulki va It]], [[It va tulki]], [[It va Tulki]], [[Fox and the Hound]], [[Fox and Hound]], [[The Hound and the Fox]], [[Hound and the Fox]], [[Hound and Fox]], and some Wikipedias include a disambig, so it could also be redirected from [[The Fox and the Hound (film)]] or [[The Fox and the Hound (1981)]]. And finally, there could also be a redirect from [[Charlotte's Web (film, 1973)]] to [[Charlotte's Web (multfilm)]], as well as from [[Charlotte's Web (film, 2006)]] to [[Charlotte's Web (film)]] and from [[Charlotte's Web (roman)]] to [[Charlotte's Web]]. Just a suggestion, as I thought if more redirects is a good thing, then these should be good suggestions. [[Maxsus:Contributions/104.58.147.208|104.58.147.208]] 05:55, 2-Yanvar 2019 (UTC)
:::There are no official rules on how to spell names/titles that are originally written in a Latin alphabet. Take, for example, Shekspir vs Shakespeare. I think the former is an abomination: it's a Latin spelling of an English name based on a Russian transliteration. It's funny how most people are OK with monstrosities like Jorj Oruell, since it flies in the face of the nationalistic policies of the Uzbek government which wants to get rid of all Russian heritage in the country. Here on uzwiki we stick to the original and provide pronunciations. As for the redirects, you can go ahead and create as many as you want. I have absolutely no interest in obscure flicks. [[Foydalanuvchi:Nataev|<span style="color:red;">N</span><span style="color:blue;">ataev</span>]] <sup>[[Foydalanuvchi munozarasi:Nataev|munozara]]</sup> 09:52, 2-Yanvar 2019 (UTC)
::::Should Dambo be moved as well then? I already edited it. Also, I was wondering if it would be better to move Charlotte's Web (multfilm) to Charlotte's Web (film, 1973) and Charlotte's Web (film) to Charlotte's Web (film, 2006). After all, they are both films, so reading the disambig for the 2006 film as simply film might be confusing. And I would think to move it without redirect due to there being two films of the same name. Meanwhile, could the past history of Bambi be restored now that the page exists with better content? I think it would be good to have for historical reasons. Same for Dumbo. Finally, I noticed that the files [[:Fayl:Foxhoundposter.jpg]] and [[:Fayl:Qirol Sher.jpg]] don't have the same poster titles and poster images as in the English Wikipedia articles. The file for The Fox and the Hound is known in English as [[:en:File:The Fox and the Hound.jpg]] while the file for The Lion King is known as [[:en:File:The Lion King poster.jpg]]. Would it be possible to upload new versions of these files (based on English Wikipedia), along with their names changed to the names in English Wikipedia and the fair use rationales added? Either that, or should new files be uploaded instead? After all, there is no fair use rationale on the Qirol Sher file, only the signature of the user who uploaded it (sinner 90), and the date (21:05, 23 Aprel 2010). And then the file for The Fox and the Hound just lists "Manba" with the link to the English version of the file, but still no fair use rationale. The file in English was moved anyway, and is currently a dead link. [[Maxsus:Contributions/104.58.147.208|104.58.147.208]] 11:08, 2-Yanvar 2019 (UTC)
| |||