Encyclopædia Britannica: Versiyalar orasidagi farq
Kontent oʻchirildi Kontent qoʻshildi
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8 |
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8 |
||
Qator 99:
„Britannica“ koʻpincha hissa qoʻshuvchi tanlashda adashadi. Bunga muhim misol 3-nashrning (1788-1797) bosh muharriri [[George Gleig]] [[Isaac Newton]]ning gravitatsiya teoriyasini qabul qilmagani va gravitatsiyaning sababi olov klassik elementidir deb yozganidir.<ref name="kogan_1958" /> Shunday boʻlsa ham, „Britannnica“ his-tuygʻu va ishonchlar bilan bogʻliq mavzularga ilmiy yondashib kelyapti. Masalan, 9-nashrda [[William Robertson Smith]]ning din haqidagi maqolalarida shunday qilingan. Xususan, Smithning [[Bibliya]] tarixiy xatolarga egaligi haqidagi maqolalariga (1875) ilmiy yondashilgan.<ref name="kogan_1958" />
Muharrirlar tanqid qilinganiga yana boshqa bir misol Britannica muharrirlar hay’ati aʼzosi [[Wendy Doniger]]ning<ref>{{cite web |url=https://corporate.britannica.com/board/doniger.html |title=Encyclopædia Britannica Board of Editors |work=Encyclopædia Britannica |accessdate=16 August 2012 |archivedate=2012-12-21 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121221073525/https://corporate.britannica.com/board/doniger.html }}</ref> [[Hinduizm]]ga bergan salbiy taʼrifidir.<ref>Ramaswamy, Krishnan ed. ''[[Invading the Sacred]].'' 2007. New Delhi. Rupa and co.</ref><ref>[http://magazine.uchicago.edu/0412/features/index.shtml „The Interpretation of Gods“], by Amy Braverman, University of Chicago Magazine: 97:2 (2004)</ref> „Britannica“da Hinduizm haqidagi maqolalari umuman olganda tanqidga uchrab kelyapti.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hinduismtoday.com/blogs-news/hindu-press-international/encyclopaedia-britannica-will-review-its-hinduism-article/8506.html|title=Encyclopædia Britannica Will Review Its Hinduism Article|work=[[Hinduism Today Magazine]]|date=16 May 2009|accessdate=16 March 2011}}</ref>
=== „Encyclopædia Britannica“ tanqidi ===
|